“MEN HAVE ISSUES, ERGO FEMINISM IS INVALID”
Kinda not what us masculists (she tags this post “what about teh menz”, feminism, masculism, privilege denial” — the masculism part is where I derive that it is this of which she speaks) say, but you can have that. We, rather say that a movement that propounds equality should not focus on the issues that face only one half of the sexual spectrum. Not very equal, is it?
So there’s masculism. For the other, equally valid half of the spectrum. Not to invalidate you, rather to validate us. Get it now?
‘Course, I’m neither, I’m a nonbiased gender egalitarian. Validates both, without invalidating either. See, equality.
Regards,
This is a Libertarian blog, so I might not be as PC as you might like. I will, however, attempt, to the best of my ability, to be logical. If you don't like that, you need not apply. I will post about economics, government, social issues, and maybe some frivolous stuff. For info on what I mean by "not being PC" refer to the below image. That being said, enjoy your stay.
Operating hours: weekdays
